Pith. sign in

Last Iterate Risk Bounds of SGD with Decaying Stepsize for Overparameterized Linear Regression

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) has been shown to generalize well in many deep learning applications. In practice, one often runs SGD with a geometrically decaying stepsize, i.e., a constant initial stepsize followed by multiple geometric stepsize decay, and uses the last iterate as the output. This kind of SGD is known to be nearly minimax optimal for classical finite-dimensional linear regression problems (Ge et al., 2019). However, a sharp analysis for the last iterate of SGD in the overparameterized setting is still open. In this paper, we provide a problem-dependent analysis on the last iterate risk bounds of SGD with decaying stepsize, for (overparameterized) linear regression problems. In particular, for last iterate SGD with (tail) geometrically decaying stepsize, we prove nearly matching upper and lower bounds on the excess risk. Moreover, we provide an excess risk lower bound for last iterate SGD with polynomially decaying stepsize and demonstrate the advantage of geometrically decaying stepsize in an instance-wise manner, which complements the minimax rate comparison made in prior works.

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

The Fourth Quadrant: A Stylized View of Benign Misfitting

cs.LG · 2026-08-02 · conditional · novelty 6.0

In a stylized single-spike linear model, useful span predictors in the window d/gamma^2 << n << d/gamma are forced to overshoot the training labels, so good test error comes together with large training error.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • The Fourth Quadrant: A Stylized View of Benign Misfitting cs.LG · 2026-08-02 · conditional · none · ref 220 · internal anchor

    In a stylized single-spike linear model, useful span predictors in the window d/gamma^2 << n << d/gamma are forced to overshoot the training labels, so good test error comes together with large training error.