The paper claims an improved differentially private rank-k covariance approximation via complex Gaussian noise and Dyson Brownian motion, but its real-part output can have rank up to 2k, so the main theorem as stated is unsupported.
Singular Subspace Perturbation Bounds via Rectangular Random Matrix Diffusions
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Given a matrix $A \in \mathbb{R}^{m\times d}$ with singular values $\sigma_1\geq \cdots \geq \sigma_d$, and a random matrix $G \in \mathbb{R}^{m\times d}$ with iid $N(0,T)$ entries for some $T>0$, we derive new bounds on the Frobenius distance between subspaces spanned by the top-$k$ (right) singular vectors of $A$ and $A+G$. This problem arises in numerous applications in statistics where a data matrix may be corrupted by Gaussian noise, and in the analysis of the Gaussian mechanism in differential privacy, where Gaussian noise is added to data to preserve private information. We show that, for matrices $A$ where the gaps in the top-$k$ singular values are roughly $\Omega(\sigma_k-\sigma_{k+1})$ the expected Frobenius distance between the subspaces is $\tilde{O}(\frac{\sqrt{d}}{\sigma_k-\sigma_{k+1}} \times \sqrt{T})$, improving on previous bounds by a factor of $\frac{\sqrt{m}}{\sqrt{d}} \sqrt{k}$. To obtain our bounds we view the perturbation to the singular vectors as a diffusion process -- the Dyson-Bessel process -- and use tools from stochastic calculus to track the evolution of the subspace spanned by the top-$k$ singular vectors.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.DS 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Private Low-Rank Approximation for Covariance Matrices, Dyson Brownian Motion, and Eigenvalue-Gap Bounds for Gaussian Perturbations
The paper claims an improved differentially private rank-k covariance approximation via complex Gaussian noise and Dyson Brownian motion, but its real-part output can have rank up to 2k, so the main theorem as stated is unsupported.