The research identifies a 'modality gap' and a 'self-blame' phenomenon in blind users' interactions with agentic AI, advocating for non-visual, blame-aware explanation frameworks.
Understanding User Reliance on AI in Assisted Decision-Making
2 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 56 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
56
external citations · Crossref
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
Recruiters perceive themselves as retaining agency over GenAI in hiring pipelines, yet GenAI invisibly architects core evaluation inputs, producing only marginal efficiency gains at the cost of deskilling.
citing papers explorer
-
Explainable AI for Blind and Low-Vision Users: Navigating Trust, Modality, and Interpretability in the Agentic Era
The research identifies a 'modality gap' and a 'self-blame' phenomenon in blind users' interactions with agentic AI, advocating for non-visual, blame-aware explanation frameworks.
-
Resume-ing Control: (Mis)Perceptions of Agency Around GenAI Use in Recruiting Workflows
Recruiters perceive themselves as retaining agency over GenAI in hiring pipelines, yet GenAI invisibly architects core evaluation inputs, producing only marginal efficiency gains at the cost of deskilling.