Static analysis tools detect 14-85% of library hallucinations in LLM code but are limited to at most 48.5-77% coverage even in ideal cases.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
An Empirical Analysis of Static Analysis Methods for Detection and Mitigation of Code Library Hallucinations
Static analysis tools detect 14-85% of library hallucinations in LLM code but are limited to at most 48.5-77% coverage even in ideal cases.