RCTs are statistically special because they set the treatment probability, but they are not scientifically sufficient because generalization across people, places, treatments, and times requires knowledge we rarely have.
Nonparametric identification is not enough, but randomized controlled trials are
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
stat.ME 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Enough?
RCTs are statistically special because they set the treatment probability, but they are not scientifically sufficient because generalization across people, places, treatments, and times requires knowledge we rarely have.