ASPIRE is an open-source web dashboard that lets IR researchers compare retrieval runs, drill into query-level results, and explore how query characteristics and relevance judgments relate to performance.
UNIMIB at TREC 2021 Clinical Trials Track
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
This contribution summarizes the participation of the UNIMIB team to the TREC 2021 Clinical Trials Track. We have investigated the effect of different query representations combined with several retrieval models on the retrieval performance. First, we have implemented a neural re-ranking approach to study the effectiveness of dense text representations. Additionally, we have investigated the effectiveness of a novel decision-theoretic model for relevance estimation. Finally, both of the above relevance models have been compared with standard retrieval approaches. In particular, we combined a keyword extraction method with a standard retrieval process based on the BM25 model and a decision-theoretic relevance model that exploits the characteristics of this particular search task. The obtained results show that the proposed keyword extraction method improves 84% of the queries over the TREC's median NDCG@10 measure when combined with either traditional or decision-theoretic relevance models. Moreover, regarding RPEC@10, the employed decision-theoretic model improves 85% of the queries over the reported TREC's median value.
fields
cs.IR 1years
2024 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
ASPIRE: Assistive System for Performance Evaluation in IR
ASPIRE is an open-source web dashboard that lets IR researchers compare retrieval runs, drill into query-level results, and explore how query characteristics and relevance judgments relate to performance.