DESI DR2 combined with CC, SNIa and CMB priors give H0≈63–64 km s−1 Mpc−1 for flat/non-flat DGP and ΔAIC>100 against ΛCDM, strongly disfavoring the model.
Cosmic Constraint to DGP Brane Model: Geometrical and Dynamical Perspectives
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 34 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In this paper, the Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati (DGP) brane model is confronted by current cosmic observational data sets from geometrical and dynamical perspectives. On the geometrical side, the recent released Union2 $557$ of type Ia supernovae (SN Ia), the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) from Sloan Digital Sky Survey and the Two Degree Galaxy Redshift Survey (transverse and radial to line-of-sight data points), the cosmic microwave background (CMB) measurement given by the seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe observations (shift parameters $R$, $l_a(z_\ast)$ and redshift at the last scatter surface $z_\ast$), ages of high redshifts galaxies, i.e. the lookback time (LT) and the high redshift Gamma Ray Bursts (GRBs) are used. On the dynamical side, data points about the growth function (GF) of matter linear perturbations are used. Using the same data sets combination, we also constrain the flat $\Lambda$CDM model as a comparison. The results show that current geometrical and dynamical observational data sets much favor flat $\Lambda$CDM model and the departure from it is above $4\sigma$($6\sigma$) for spatially flat DGP model with(without) SN systematic errors. The consistence of growth function data points is checked in terms of relative departure of redshift-distance relation.
fields
astro-ph.CO 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Cosmological Constraints on the DGP Model in light of DESI DR2 2025 Data
DESI DR2 combined with CC, SNIa and CMB priors give H0≈63–64 km s−1 Mpc−1 for flat/non-flat DGP and ΔAIC>100 against ΛCDM, strongly disfavoring the model.