Across five LLMs and three benchmarks, orchestration adds up to 4.6 points over optimized single-call CoT at 2-4x token cost, with no difficulty-scaled benefit but strong method-by-backbone interactions.
MAS-PromptBench: When Does Prompt Optimization Improve Multi-Agent LLM Systems?
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Multi-agent systems (MAS) offer a scalable path forward for agentic AI, comprising multiple LLM-based agents, each assigned a system prompt and a position within a workflow that governs inter-agent coordination and output aggregation. System prompts thus form a critical and accessible optimization surface: they specify agents' roles and behaviors, enabling system-level improvements without model finetuning. Although prompt optimization has shown substantial potential for single LLMs, extending it to MAS poses distinct challenges, notably an exponentially growing search space. It remains unclear whether, when, and by how much prompt optimization improves MAS performance, and how sensitive such gains are to system configuration. In this work, we systematically study system-prompt optimization across a broad range of MAS setups varying in task, workflow, communication protocol, and team size, benchmarking two prompt optimizers that naturally extend state-of-the-art single-agent methods. The results reveal its potential to unlock significant gains while exposing open challenges, characterizing when and how much prompt optimization helps across diverse MAS settings.
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
When Does LLM Orchestration Pay Off? A Controlled Evaluation of Accuracy, Cost, and Task Difficulty
Across five LLMs and three benchmarks, orchestration adds up to 4.6 points over optimized single-call CoT at 2-4x token cost, with no difficulty-scaled benefit but strong method-by-backbone interactions.