A combined ab initio and experimental analysis of nuclear form factors reduces uncertainties in superallowed beta-decay rates, enabling a more precise first-row CKM unitarity test.
Title resolution pending
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
fields
nucl-th 4years
2026 4representative citing papers
Automated MBPT through fifth order yields converging ground-state energies for closed-shell nuclei up to 78Ni and exposes missing triples/quadruples in IMSRG(2).
Proton-neutron entanglement entropy is shown to track the formation of the island of inversion in Ne, Mg, and Si isotopes, with mutual information revealing stronger proton-neutron correlations in excited states than in ground states.
The hunter-gatherer scheme for the Magnus expansion in IMSRG(3) approximations introduces differences of up to 7 MeV in ground-state energies and 0.5 MeV in excitation energies compared to standard IMSRG(2) methods.
citing papers explorer
-
Taming nuclear size and shape effects in superallowed beta-decay
A combined ab initio and experimental analysis of nuclear form factors reduces uncertainties in superallowed beta-decay rates, enabling a more precise first-row CKM unitarity test.
-
High-order perturbative calculations of nuclear ground states: Automated evaluation of many-body diagrams
Automated MBPT through fifth order yields converging ground-state energies for closed-shell nuclei up to 78Ni and exposes missing triples/quadruples in IMSRG(2).
-
Entanglement study in the island of inversion region using \textit{ab initio} approach
Proton-neutron entanglement entropy is shown to track the formation of the island of inversion in Ne, Mg, and Si isotopes, with mutual information revealing stronger proton-neutron correlations in excited states than in ground states.
-
Computational schemes for the Magnus expansion of the in-medium similarity renormalization group
The hunter-gatherer scheme for the Magnus expansion in IMSRG(3) approximations introduces differences of up to 7 MeV in ground-state energies and 0.5 MeV in excitation energies compared to standard IMSRG(2) methods.