Pith. sign in

Measure-Observe-Remeasure: An Interactive Paradigm for Differentially-Private Exploratory Analysis

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Differential privacy (DP) has the potential to enable privacy-preserving analysis on sensitive data, but requires analysts to judiciously spend a limited ``privacy loss budget'' $\epsilon$ across queries. Analysts conducting exploratory analyses do not, however, know all queries in advance and seldom have DP expertise. Thus, they are limited in their ability to specify $\epsilon$ allotments across queries prior to an analysis. To support analysts in spending $\epsilon$ efficiently, we propose a new interactive analysis paradigm, Measure-Observe-Remeasure, where analysts ``measure'' the database with a limited amount of $\epsilon$, observe estimates and their errors, and remeasure with more $\epsilon$ as needed. We instantiate the paradigm in an interactive visualization interface which allows analysts to spend increasing amounts of $\epsilon$ under a total budget. To observe how analysts interact with the Measure-Observe-Remeasure paradigm via the interface, we conduct a user study that compares the utility of $\epsilon$ allocations and findings from sensitive data participants make to the allocations and findings expected of a rational agent who faces the same decision task. We find that participants are able to use the workflow relatively successfully, including using budget allocation strategies that maximize over half of the available utility stemming from $\epsilon$ allocation. Their loss in performance relative to a rational agent appears to be driven more by their inability to access information and report it than to allocate $\epsilon$.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.HC 1

years

2024 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

SoK: Usability Studies in Differential Privacy

cs.HC · 2024-12-22 · conditional · novelty 5.0

A systematic review of 27 differential privacy usability studies finds persistent difficulties in communicating epsilon and privacy-utility tradeoffs and notes that current tools still require substantial DP expertise.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • SoK: Usability Studies in Differential Privacy cs.HC · 2024-12-22 · conditional · none · ref 31 · internal anchor

    A systematic review of 27 differential privacy usability studies finds persistent difficulties in communicating epsilon and privacy-utility tradeoffs and notes that current tools still require substantial DP expertise.