A covariant Moore-Penrose algorithm for complex degenerate metrics is formulated, but its uniqueness and torsion interpretation depend on an arbitrary auxiliary metric and the central proof is incomplete.
No-boundary prescriptions in Lorentzian quantum cosmology
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We analyse the impact of various boundary conditions on the (minisuperspace) Lorentzian gravitational path integral. In particular we assess the implications for the Hartle-Hawking no-boundary wavefunction. It was shown recently that when this proposal is defined as a sum over compact metrics, problems arise with the stability of fluctuations. These difficulties can be overcome by an especially simple implementation of the no-boundary idea: namely to take the Einstein-Hilbert action at face value while adding no boundary term. This prescription simultaneously imposes an initial Neumann boundary condition for the scale factor of the universe and, for a Bianchi IX spacetime, Dirichlet conditions for the anisotropies. Another way to implement the no-boundary wavefunction is to use Robin boundary conditions. A sub-class of Robin conditions allows one to specify the Hubble rate on the boundary hypersurface, and we highlight the surprising aspect that specifying the final Hubble rate (rather than the final size of the universe) significantly alters the off-shell structure of the path integral. The conclusion of our investigations is that all current working examples of the no-boundary wavefunction force one to abandon the notion of a sum over compact and regular geometries, and point to the importance of an initial Euclidean momentum.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
gr-qc 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Complex degenerate metrics in general relativity: a covariant extension of the Moore-Penrose algorithm
A covariant Moore-Penrose algorithm for complex degenerate metrics is formulated, but its uniqueness and torsion interpretation depend on an arbitrary auxiliary metric and the central proof is incomplete.