Pith. sign in

On minimal nonperfectly divisible fork-free graphs

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

A fork is a graph obtained from $K_{1,3}$ (usually called claw) by subdividing an edge once. A graph is perfectly divisible if for each of its induced subgraph $H$, $V(H)$ can be partitioned into $A$ and $B$ such that $H[A]$ is perfect and $\omega(H[B]) < \omega(H)$. In this paper, we prove that the perfect divisibility of fork-free graphs is equivalent to that of claw-free graphs. We also prove that, for $F\in \{P_7, P_6\cup K_1\}$, each (fork, $F$)-free graph $G$ is perfectly divisible and hence $\chi(G)\leq \binom{\omega(G)+1}{2}$.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

math.CO 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Every fork-free graph is perfectly weight divisible

math.CO · 2026-08-13 · conditional · novelty 8.0

Every fork-free graph is perfectly weight divisible, confirming Sivaraman's conjecture and yielding chi(G) at most binomial(omega(G)+1,2) for every fork-free graph.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Every fork-free graph is perfectly weight divisible math.CO · 2026-08-13 · conditional · none · ref 30 · internal anchor

    Every fork-free graph is perfectly weight divisible, confirming Sivaraman's conjecture and yielding chi(G) at most binomial(omega(G)+1,2) for every fork-free graph.