The paper argues that apparent disobedience by LLMs in safety tests is better interpreted as emerging ethical reasoning, and that AI safety should evaluate moral judgment rather than obedience.
TRIAGE: Ethical Benchmarking of AI Models Through Mass Casualty Simulations
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We present the TRIAGE Benchmark, a novel machine ethics (ME) benchmark that tests LLMs' ability to make ethical decisions during mass casualty incidents. It uses real-world ethical dilemmas with clear solutions designed by medical professionals, offering a more realistic alternative to annotation-based benchmarks. TRIAGE incorporates various prompting styles to evaluate model performance across different contexts. Most models consistently outperformed random guessing, suggesting LLMs may support decision-making in triage scenarios. Neutral or factual scenario formulations led to the best performance, unlike other ME benchmarks where ethical reminders improved outcomes. Adversarial prompts reduced performance but not to random guessing levels. Open-source models made more morally serious errors, and general capability overall predicted better performance.
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Moral Responsibility or Obedience: What Do We Want from AI?
The paper argues that apparent disobedience by LLMs in safety tests is better interpreted as emerging ethical reasoning, and that AI safety should evaluate moral judgment rather than obedience.