Pith. sign in

Value Imprint: A Technique for Auditing the Human Values Embedded in RLHF Datasets

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

LLMs are increasingly fine-tuned using RLHF datasets to align them with human preferences and values. However, very limited research has investigated which specific human values are operationalized through these datasets. In this paper, we introduce Value Imprint, a framework for auditing and classifying the human values embedded within RLHF datasets. To investigate the viability of this framework, we conducted three case study experiments by auditing the Anthropic/hh-rlhf, OpenAI WebGPT Comparisons, and Alpaca GPT-4-LLM datasets to examine the human values embedded within them. Our analysis involved a two-phase process. During the first phase, we developed a taxonomy of human values through an integrated review of prior works from philosophy, axiology, and ethics. Then, we applied this taxonomy to annotate 6,501 RLHF preferences. During the second phase, we employed the labels generated from the annotation as ground truth data for training a transformer-based machine learning model to audit and classify the three RLHF datasets. Through this approach, we discovered that information-utility values, including Wisdom/Knowledge and Information Seeking, were the most dominant human values within all three RLHF datasets. In contrast, prosocial and democratic values, including Well-being, Justice, and Human/Animal Rights, were the least represented human values. These findings have significant implications for developing language models that align with societal values and norms. We contribute our datasets to support further research in this area.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.AI 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

support 1

representative citing papers

AI Alignment at Your Discretion

cs.AI · 2025-02-10 · conditional · novelty 7.0

The paper formalizes alignment discretion and shows empirically that annotators and models exercise substantial, often arbitrary, and mutually divergent discretion when applying alignment principles.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • AI Alignment at Your Discretion cs.AI · 2025-02-10 · conditional · none · ref 77 · internal anchor

    The paper formalizes alignment discretion and shows empirically that annotators and models exercise substantial, often arbitrary, and mutually divergent discretion when applying alignment principles.