Pith. sign in

Claudini: Autoresearch discovers state-of-the-art adversarial attack algorithms for llms

5 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

5 Pith papers citing it
abstract

We show that AI agents are capable of discovering novel algorithms for adversarial attacks against LLMs, advancing the state of the art on white-box jailbreaking and prompt injection evaluations. We deploy frontier agents, such as Claude Code and Codex, in an autoresearch loop with access to a library of 30+ prior methods and an evaluation script with a fixed compute budget. We show this pipeline to be effective in jailbreaking OpenAI's GPT-OSS-Safeguard-20B and in prompt injections against Meta-SecAlign-70B, an adversarially robust model. For GPT-OSS-Safeguard, the best agent-discovered method achieves up to 80\% attack success rate on CBRN queries, compared to <50\% for existing methods. For SecAlign, it achieves 100\% ASR, while the best prior automated methods only achieve 82\%. Notably, in our setting, attack methods are developed on unrelated surrogate models for a pure random-target token-forcing task, yet generalize directly to prompt injection on the adversarially trained model. Finally, we trace the lineage of methods developed during autoresearch, characterizing the agents' strategies and failure modes. Adversarial ML has long held that defenses must be evaluated against attacks tailored to them; autoresearch automates this principle, and we argue it should be the minimum bar for defense evaluation going forward.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 5

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Memory-Induced Tool-Drift in LLM Agents

cs.CR · 2026-05-24 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Biased long-term memories in LLM agents cause measurable deviations in tool parameters across 105 scenarios, seven models, and 608 real tools, persisting under standard memory architectures.

The Evaluation Game: Beyond Static LLM Benchmarking

cs.LG · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Presents a game-theoretic model with group actions for data augmentation in LLM adversarial evaluation, demonstrating local generalization from fine-tuning on three model families and redefining benchmarks as orbits under group actions.

citing papers explorer

Showing 5 of 5 citing papers.

  • FAPO: Fully Automated Prompt Optimization of Multi-Step LLM Pipelines cs.SE · 2026-06-17 · unverdicted · none · ref 24 · internal anchor

    FAPO automates LLM pipeline optimization via iterative diagnosis and prompt-or-structure edits, beating GEPA baseline by +14.1 pp mean across 18 comparisons and +33.8 pp when structural changes occur.

  • Memory-Induced Tool-Drift in LLM Agents cs.CR · 2026-05-24 · unverdicted · none · ref 24 · internal anchor

    Biased long-term memories in LLM agents cause measurable deviations in tool parameters across 105 scenarios, seven models, and 608 real tools, persisting under standard memory architectures.

  • WMAttack: Automated Attack Search for Adversarial Evaluation of World-Model Agents cs.LG · 2026-05-22 · unverdicted · none · ref 39 · internal anchor

    WMAttack automates finite-budget attack search for world-model agents via SCAS and RGAR, reporting higher normalized reward drops than baselines on Atari and DMC tasks.

  • MLS-Bench: A Holistic and Rigorous Assessment of AI Systems on Building Better AI cs.LG · 2026-05-09 · accept · none · ref 73 · 2 links · internal anchor

    Current AI agents fail to reliably invent transferable ML methods on a controlled 140-task benchmark, and more test-time compute or context does not remove the scientific-judgment bottleneck.

  • The Evaluation Game: Beyond Static LLM Benchmarking cs.LG · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · none · ref 42 · internal anchor

    Presents a game-theoretic model with group actions for data augmentation in LLM adversarial evaluation, demonstrating local generalization from fine-tuning on three model families and redefining benchmarks as orbits under group actions.