A perspective comparing two quantum-complexity definitions of wavefunction branches, finding neither satisfactory and identifying the open problems that remain.
Classical branch structure from spatial redundancy in a many-body wavefunction
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
When the wavefunction of a large quantum system unitarily evolves away from a low-entropy initial state, there is strong circumstantial evidence it develops "branches": a decomposition into orthogonal components that is indistinguishable from the corresponding incoherent mixture with feasible observations. Is this decomposition unique? Must the number of branches increase with time? These questions are hard to answer because there is no formal definition of branches, and most intuition is based on toy models with arbitrarily preferred degrees of freedom. Here, assuming only the tensor structure associated with spatial locality, I show that branch decompositions are highly constrained just by the requirement that they exhibit redundant local records. The set of all redundantly recorded observables induces a preferred decomposition into simultaneous eigenstates unless their records are highly extended and delicately overlapping, as exemplified by the Shor error-correcting code. A maximum length scale for records is enough to guarantee uniqueness. Speculatively, objective branch decompositions may speed up numerical simulations of nonstationary many-body states, illuminate the thermalization of closed systems, and demote measurement from fundamental primitive in the quantum formalism.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
quant-ph 1years
2025 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Wavefunction branches demand a definition!
A perspective comparing two quantum-complexity definitions of wavefunction branches, finding neither satisfactory and identifying the open problems that remain.