LAT logic adds time and open-world uncertainty to annotated logic programs; its PyReason engine dynamically materializes only the atoms it needs, showing orders-of-magnitude speedups and memory savings.
Deep Inductive Logic Programming meets Reinforcement Learning
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
One approach to explaining the hierarchical levels of understanding within a machine learning model is the symbolic method of inductive logic programming (ILP), which is data efficient and capable of learning first-order logic rules that can entail data behaviour. A differentiable extension to ILP, so-called differentiable Neural Logic (dNL) networks, are able to learn Boolean functions as their neural architecture includes symbolic reasoning. We propose an application of dNL in the field of Relational Reinforcement Learning (RRL) to address dynamic continuous environments. This represents an extension of previous work in applying dNL-based ILP in RRL settings, as our proposed model updates the architecture to enable it to solve problems in continuous RL environments. The goal of this research is to improve upon current ILP methods for use in RRL by incorporating non-linear continuous predicates, allowing RRL agents to reason and make decisions in dynamic and continuous environments.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LO 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Lattice Annotated Temporal (LAT) Logic for Non-Markovian Reasoning
LAT logic adds time and open-world uncertainty to annotated logic programs; its PyReason engine dynamically materializes only the atoms it needs, showing orders-of-magnitude speedups and memory savings.