pith. sign in

Title resolution pending

3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

3 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 2

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.AI 3

years

2026 3

roles

background 2

polarities

background 2

representative citing papers

DeepSlide: From Artifacts to Presentation Delivery

cs.AI · 2026-04-01 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

DeepSlide introduces a multi-agent system for full presentation preparation that matches baselines on slide quality but improves narrative flow, pacing, and script synergy via a new dual-scoreboard benchmark.

AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide

cs.AI · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

The paper delivers a stage-by-stage roadmap for AI in research, showing reliable assistance in retrieval and tool tasks but fragility in novelty and judgment, advocating human-governed collaboration.

AI-Generated Slides: Are They Good? Can Students Tell?

cs.AI · 2026-05-13 · accept · novelty 4.0

Coding-assistant AI tools generate slides that educators judge accurate and pedagogically sound, students rate them equal to instructor slides, and cannot reliably identify them as AI-generated.

citing papers explorer

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.

  • DeepSlide: From Artifacts to Presentation Delivery cs.AI · 2026-04-01 · unverdicted · none · ref 20

    DeepSlide introduces a multi-agent system for full presentation preparation that matches baselines on slide quality but improves narrative flow, pacing, and script synergy via a new dual-scoreboard benchmark.

  • AI for Auto-Research: Roadmap & User Guide cs.AI · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · none · ref 3

    The paper delivers a stage-by-stage roadmap for AI in research, showing reliable assistance in retrieval and tool tasks but fragility in novelty and judgment, advocating human-governed collaboration.

  • AI-Generated Slides: Are They Good? Can Students Tell? cs.AI · 2026-05-13 · accept · none · ref 1

    Coding-assistant AI tools generate slides that educators judge accurate and pedagogically sound, students rate them equal to instructor slides, and cannot reliably identify them as AI-generated.