A compilation of three research programs showing that GPT detectors are biased against non-native writers, that population-level estimates place AI-modified text at up to 16.9% of AI-conference reviews and up to 24% in some domains, and that GPT-4 feedback overlaps with human peer review at…
Watermarking Conditional Text Generation for AI Detection: Unveiling Challenges and a Semantic-Aware Watermark Remedy
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
To mitigate potential risks associated with language models, recent AI detection research proposes incorporating watermarks into machine-generated text through random vocabulary restrictions and utilizing this information for detection. While these watermarks only induce a slight deterioration in perplexity, our empirical investigation reveals a significant detriment to the performance of conditional text generation. To address this issue, we introduce a simple yet effective semantic-aware watermarking algorithm that considers the characteristics of conditional text generation and the input context. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed method yields substantial improvements across various text generation models, including BART and Flan-T5, in tasks such as summarization and data-to-text generation while maintaining detection ability.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Computational Approaches to Understanding Large Language Model Impact on Writing and Information Ecosystems
A compilation of three research programs showing that GPT detectors are biased against non-native writers, that population-level estimates place AI-modified text at up to 16.9% of AI-conference reviews and up to 24% in some domains, and that GPT-4 feedback overlaps with human peer review at…