The abstract claims commercial ASR reaches about 78% word error rate on deaf speech versus 18% on hearing speech, but the body of the paper reports no protocol for that comparison and only cites 53% WER for the most intelligible deaf speakers.
They do not generally consider speech to text translations to be particularly important
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.HC 1years
2019 1verdicts
REJECT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Deaf, Hard of Hearing, and Hearing Perspectives on using Automatic Speech Recognition in Conversation
The abstract claims commercial ASR reaches about 78% word error rate on deaf speech versus 18% on hearing speech, but the body of the paper reports no protocol for that comparison and only cites 53% WER for the most intelligible deaf speakers.