pith. sign in

Protoplanetary disc `isochrones' and the evolution of discs in the $\dot{M}-M_{\rm d}$ plane

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

In this paper, we compare simple viscous diffusion models for the disc evolution with the results of recent surveys of the properties of young protoplanetary discs. We introduce the useful concept of `disc isochrones' in the accretion rate - disc mass plane and explore a set of Montecarlo realization of disc initial conditions. We find that such simple viscous models can provide a remarkable agreement with the available data in the Lupus star forming region, with the key requirement that the average viscous evolutionary timescale of the discs is comparable to the cluster age. Our models produce naturally a correlation between mass accretion rate and disc mass that is shallower than linear, contrary to previous results and in agreement with observations. We also predict that a linear correlation, with a tighter scatter, should be found for more evolved disc populations. Finally, we find that such viscous models can reproduce the observations in the Lupus region only in the assumption that the efficiency of angular momentum transport is a growing function of radius, thus putting interesting constraints on the nature of the microscopic processes that lead to disc accretion.

fields

astro-ph.SR 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

The Accretion Process on Protostars

astro-ph.SR · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · novelty 2.0

The paper reviews techniques for measuring protostellar accretion, analyzes methodological differences and caveats in comparing observations with simulations, and outlines next steps for a fuller picture.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • The Accretion Process on Protostars astro-ph.SR · 2026-05-13 · unverdicted · none · ref 95 · internal anchor

    The paper reviews techniques for measuring protostellar accretion, analyzes methodological differences and caveats in comparing observations with simulations, and outlines next steps for a fuller picture.