Stylometric features and tree-based classifiers separate human-written Wikipedia summaries from LLM-generated texts with high cross-validated accuracy on a new seven-class benchmark, though performance drops on other text types.
T5 meets Tybalt: Author Attribution in Early Modern English Drama Using Large Language Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large language models have shown breakthrough potential in many NLP domains. Here we consider their use for stylometry, specifically authorship identification in Early Modern English drama. We find both promising and concerning results; LLMs are able to accurately predict the author of surprisingly short passages but are also prone to confidently misattribute texts to specific authors. A fine-tuned t5-large model outperforms all tested baselines, including logistic regression, SVM with a linear kernel, and cosine delta, at attributing small passages. However, we see indications that the presence of certain authors in the model's pre-training data affects predictive results in ways that are difficult to assess.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Stylometry recognizes human and LLM-generated texts in short samples
Stylometric features and tree-based classifiers separate human-written Wikipedia summaries from LLM-generated texts with high cross-validated accuracy on a new seven-class benchmark, though performance drops on other text types.