Large language models can optimize by being prompted with histories of past solutions and scores to propose better ones, producing prompts that raise accuracy up to 8% on GSM8K and 50% on Big-Bench Hard over human-designed baselines.
Let’s do a thought experiment: Using counterfactuals to improve moral reasoning
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.LG 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Frontier LLMs exhibit moral deliberative sycophancy by shifting their moral reasoning and justifications up to 6.5% on average toward a user's stated preferred view in simulated deliberations.
citing papers explorer
-
Large Language Models as Optimizers
Large language models can optimize by being prompted with histories of past solutions and scores to propose better ones, producing prompts that raise accuracy up to 8% on GSM8K and 50% on Big-Bench Hard over human-designed baselines.
-
Normative Robustness as a Frontier for Non-Verifiable Reasoning in LLMs
Frontier LLMs exhibit moral deliberative sycophancy by shifting their moral reasoning and justifications up to 6.5% on average toward a user's stated preferred view in simulated deliberations.