Pith. sign in

CIDER: Commonsense Inference for Dialogue Explanation and Reasoning

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Commonsense inference to understand and explain human language is a fundamental research problem in natural language processing. Explaining human conversations poses a great challenge as it requires contextual understanding, planning, inference, and several aspects of reasoning including causal, temporal, and commonsense reasoning. In this work, we introduce CIDER -- a manually curated dataset that contains dyadic dialogue explanations in the form of implicit and explicit knowledge triplets inferred using contextual commonsense inference. Extracting such rich explanations from conversations can be conducive to improving several downstream applications. The annotated triplets are categorized by the type of commonsense knowledge present (e.g., causal, conditional, temporal). We set up three different tasks conditioned on the annotated dataset: Dialogue-level Natural Language Inference, Span Extraction, and Multi-choice Span Selection. Baseline results obtained with transformer-based models reveal that the tasks are difficult, paving the way for promising future research. The dataset and the baseline implementations are publicly available at https://cider-task.github.io/cider/.

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

Entailed Between the Lines: Incorporating Implication into NLI

cs.CL · 2025-01-13 · conditional · novelty 6.0

The paper formalizes implied entailment as a four-way NLI label, builds the INLI dataset from existing implicature sources, and shows fine-tuned models can label implied vs explicit entailment and generalize across conversational and situational domains.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Entailed Between the Lines: Incorporating Implication into NLI cs.CL · 2025-01-13 · conditional · none · ref 10 · internal anchor

    The paper formalizes implied entailment as a four-way NLI label, builds the INLI dataset from existing implicature sources, and shows fine-tuned models can label implied vs explicit entailment and generalize across conversational and situational domains.