On realistic, high-cardinality, imbalanced text tasks, weak supervision beats supervised learning until supervised training has over 1,000 labeled examples.
The ALCHEmist: Automated Labeling 500x CHEaper Than LLM Data Annotators
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Large pretrained models can be used as annotators, helping replace or augment crowdworkers and enabling distilling generalist models into smaller specialist models. Unfortunately, this comes at a cost: employing top-of-the-line models often requires paying thousands of dollars for API calls, while the resulting datasets are static and challenging to audit. To address these challenges, we propose a simple alternative: rather than directly querying labels from pretrained models, we task models to generate programs that can produce labels. These programs can be stored and applied locally, re-used and extended, and cost orders of magnitude less. Our system, Alchemist, obtains comparable to or better performance than large language model-based annotation in a range of tasks for a fraction of the cost: on average, improvements amount to a 12.9% enhancement while the total labeling costs across all datasets are reduced by a factor of approximately 500x.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Stronger Than You Think: Benchmarking Weak Supervision on Realistic Tasks
On realistic, high-cardinality, imbalanced text tasks, weak supervision beats supervised learning until supervised training has over 1,000 labeled examples.