Pith. sign in

Fair assortment planning

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Many online platforms, ranging from online retail stores to social media platforms, employ algorithms to optimize their offered assortment of items (e.g., products and contents). These algorithms often focus exclusively on achieving the platforms' objectives, highlighting items with the highest popularity or revenue. This approach, however, can compromise the equality of opportunities for the rest of the items, in turn leading to less content diversity and increased regulatory scrutiny for the platform. Motivated by this, we introduce and study a fair assortment planning problem that enforces equality of opportunities via pairwise fairness, which requires any two items to be offered similar outcomes. We show that the problem can be formulated as a linear program (LP), called (FAIR), that optimizes over the distribution of all feasible assortments. To find a near-optimal solution to (FAIR), we propose a framework based on the Ellipsoid method, which requires a polynomial-time separation oracle to the dual of the LP. We show that finding an optimal separation oracle to the dual problem is an NP-complete problem, and hence we propose a series of approximate separation oracles, which then result in a 1/2-approx. algorithm and an FPTAS for Problem (FAIR). The approximate separation oracles are designed by (i) showing the separation oracle to the dual of the LP is equivalent to solving an infinite series of parameterized knapsack problems, and (ii) leveraging the structure of knapsack problems. Finally, we perform numerical studies on both synthetic data and real-world MovieLens data, showcasing the effectiveness of our algorithms and providing insights into the platform's price of fairness.

fields

cs.CY 1 cs.SI 1

years

2026 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

representative citing papers

Optimal Exploration of New Products under Assortment Decisions

cs.SI · 2026-04-20 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0 · 2 refs

Pairing new products with top incumbents and exploring multiple new products simultaneously up to a potential-based threshold is optimal for minimizing regret in assortment-based social learning.

Learning Fair Demand Models

cs.CY · 2026-06-05 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

Compares enforcing parity-wise and Rawlsian fairness in demand estimation versus price optimization stages in a linear demand pricing model, characterizing conditions for higher social welfare and showing coincidence for Rawlsian fairness.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.

  • Optimal Exploration of New Products under Assortment Decisions cs.SI · 2026-04-20 · unverdicted · none · ref 12 · 2 links · internal anchor

    Pairing new products with top incumbents and exploring multiple new products simultaneously up to a potential-based threshold is optimal for minimizing regret in assortment-based social learning.

  • Learning Fair Demand Models cs.CY · 2026-06-05 · unverdicted · none · ref 56

    Compares enforcing parity-wise and Rawlsian fairness in demand estimation versus price optimization stages in a linear demand pricing model, characterizing conditions for higher social welfare and showing coincidence for Rawlsian fairness.