Assigning personas to Chinese LLMs amplifies toxic output relative to default behavior, while refusal rates shift systematically with persona gender and target social group.
Chinese SafetyQA: A Safety Short-form Factuality Benchmark for Large Language Models
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
With the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs), significant safety concerns have emerged. Fundamentally, the safety of large language models is closely linked to the accuracy, comprehensiveness, and clarity of their understanding of safety knowledge, particularly in domains such as law, policy and ethics. This factuality ability is crucial in determining whether these models can be deployed and applied safely and compliantly within specific regions. To address these challenges and better evaluate the factuality ability of LLMs to answer short questions, we introduce the Chinese SafetyQA benchmark. Chinese SafetyQA has several properties (i.e., Chinese, Diverse, High-quality, Static, Easy-to-evaluate, Safety-related, Harmless). Based on Chinese SafetyQA, we perform a comprehensive evaluation on the factuality abilities of existing LLMs and analyze how these capabilities relate to LLM abilities, e.g., RAG ability and robustness against attacks.
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Evaluating Chinese Large Language Models: The Influence of Persona Assignment on Stereotypes and Safeguards
Assigning personas to Chinese LLMs amplifies toxic output relative to default behavior, while refusal rates shift systematically with persona gender and target social group.