An eight-attribute fundus quality rubric with a ResNet18 regressor, plus a weakly supported claim that quality-aware filtering improves DR grading.
Acquire Precise and Comparable Fundus Image Quality Score: FTHNet and FQS Dataset
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The retinal fundus images are utilized extensively in the diagnosis, and their quality can directly affect the diagnosis results. However, due to the insufficient dataset and algorithm application, current fundus image quality assessment (FIQA) methods are not powerful enough to meet ophthalmologists` demands. In this paper, we address the limitations of datasets and algorithms in FIQA. First, we establish a new FIQA dataset, Fundus Quality Score(FQS), which includes 2246 fundus images with two labels: a continuous Mean Opinion Score varying from 0 to 100 and a three-level quality label. Then, we propose a FIQA Transformer-based Hypernetwork (FTHNet) to solve these tasks with regression results rather than classification results in conventional FIQA works. The FTHNet is optimized for the FIQA tasks with extensive experiments. Results on our FQS dataset show that the FTHNet can give quality scores for fundus images with PLCC of 0.9423 and SRCC of 0.9488, significantly outperforming other methods with fewer parameters and less computation complexity.We successfully build a dataset and model addressing the problems of current FIQA methods. Furthermore, the model deployment experiments demonstrate its potential in automatic medical image quality control. All experiments are carried out with 10-fold cross-validation to ensure the significance of the results.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
eess.IV 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
FundaQ-8: A Clinically-Inspired Scoring Framework for Automated Fundus Image Quality Assessment
An eight-attribute fundus quality rubric with a ResNet18 regressor, plus a weakly supported claim that quality-aware filtering improves DR grading.