42% of significant turn-level associations in LLM conversation analysis are spurious due to unaccounted autocorrelation, with a validated two-stage correction framework improving replication.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Autocorrelation Blind Spot: Why 42% of Turn-Level Findings in LLM Conversation Analysis May Be Spurious
42% of significant turn-level associations in LLM conversation analysis are spurious due to unaccounted autocorrelation, with a validated two-stage correction framework improving replication.