EVA reports SOTA on MIT-States, UT-Zappos, and C-GQA in closed- and open-world CZSL by combining MoE adapters with semantic variant alignment, but missing backbone-matched baselines weaken the claim.
Learning to generalize to new compositions in image understanding
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Recurrent neural networks have recently been used for learning to describe images using natural language. However, it has been observed that these models generalize poorly to scenes that were not observed during training, possibly depending too strongly on the statistics of the text in the training data. Here we propose to describe images using short structured representations, aiming to capture the crux of a description. These structured representations allow us to tease-out and evaluate separately two types of generalization: standard generalization to new images with similar scenes, and generalization to new combinations of known entities. We compare two learning approaches on the MS-COCO dataset: a state-of-the-art recurrent network based on an LSTM (Show, Attend and Tell), and a simple structured prediction model on top of a deep network. We find that the structured model generalizes to new compositions substantially better than the LSTM, ~7 times the accuracy of predicting structured representations. By providing a concrete method to quantify generalization for unseen combinations, we argue that structured representations and compositional splits are a useful benchmark for image captioning, and advocate compositional models that capture linguistic and visual structure.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CV 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
EVA: Mixture-of-Experts Semantic Variant Alignment for Compositional Zero-Shot Learning
EVA reports SOTA on MIT-States, UT-Zappos, and C-GQA in closed- and open-world CZSL by combining MoE adapters with semantic variant alignment, but missing backbone-matched baselines weaken the claim.