Introduces YesBut benchmark showing state-of-the-art multimodal models lag humans on interpreting humorous contradictions in comics.
Eliminating reasoning via inferring with planning: A new framework to guide llms’ non-linear thinking
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
Presents YesBut (V2) benchmark and shows state-of-the-art VLMs significantly underperform humans on tasks requiring comparative reasoning for contradictory humor in comics.
Introduces a mitigation technique that drops LLM accuracy on popular fiction character tasks from 96% to 72% by limiting verbatim memorization while retaining gist cues.
citing papers explorer
-
Cracking the Code of Juxtaposition: Can AI Models Understand the Humorous Contradictions
Introduces YesBut benchmark showing state-of-the-art multimodal models lag humans on interpreting humorous contradictions in comics.
-
When 'YES' Meets 'BUT': Can Large Models Comprehend Contradictory Humor Through Comparative Reasoning?
Presents YesBut (V2) benchmark and shows state-of-the-art VLMs significantly underperform humans on tasks requiring comparative reasoning for contradictory humor in comics.
-
Beyond Math: Stories as a Testbed for Memorization-Constrained Reasoning in LLMs
Introduces a mitigation technique that drops LLM accuracy on popular fiction character tasks from 96% to 72% by limiting verbatim memorization while retaining gist cues.