The new VRU-Accident benchmark (1K videos, 6K QA pairs, 1K dense captions) shows the best evaluated MLLM reaches 66.9% on VRU-accident VQA versus 94.7% for human experts, with the weakest performance on causal and preventive reasoning.
Vrucrosssafe for crossing intention prediction of vulnerable road users for improving safe crossing at in- tersections
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CV 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
VRU-Accident: A Vision-Language Benchmark for Video Question Answering and Dense Captioning for Accident Scene Understanding
The new VRU-Accident benchmark (1K videos, 6K QA pairs, 1K dense captions) shows the best evaluated MLLM reaches 66.9% on VRU-accident VQA versus 94.7% for human experts, with the weakest performance on causal and preventive reasoning.