CLIP attribution scores, normalized and aggregated over objects, reproduce the anticipatory gaze effect of Altmann and Kamide (1999) without any training on eye-tracking data.
Explaining Caption-Image Interactions in CLIP Models with Second-Order Attributions
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Dual encoder architectures like Clip models map two types of inputs into a shared embedding space and predict similarities between them. Despite their wide application, it is, however, not understood how these models compare their two inputs. Common first-order feature-attribution methods explain importances of individual features and can, thus, only provide limited insights into dual encoders, whose predictions depend on interactions between features. In this paper, we first derive a second-order method enabling the attribution of predictions by any differentiable dual encoder onto feature-interactions between its inputs. Second, we apply our method to Clip models and show that they learn fine-grained correspondences between parts of captions and regions in images. They match objects across input modes and also account for mismatches. This intrinsic visual-linguistic grounding ability, however, varies heavily between object classes, exhibits pronounced out-of-domain effects and we can identify individual errors as well as systematic failure categories. Code is publicly available: https://github.com/lucasmllr/exCLIP
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Gaze Behavior in Visual World Experiments Can be Modeled With Off-the-shelf Language-Vision Encoders
CLIP attribution scores, normalized and aggregated over objects, reproduce the anticipatory gaze effect of Altmann and Kamide (1999) without any training on eye-tracking data.