Empirical study of eight LLMs finds overuse of popular libraries like NumPy in up to 45% of unnecessary cases and strong default preference for Python even when suboptimal.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SE 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
A rapid review of fairness in LLM-enabled multi-agent systems for the software development lifecycle concludes that the field lacks standardized evaluations, broad coverage, and effective governance, leaving it unprepared for deployable fair systems.
citing papers explorer
-
A Study of LLMs' Preferences for Libraries and Programming Languages
Empirical study of eight LLMs finds overuse of popular libraries like NumPy in up to 45% of unnecessary cases and strong default preference for Python even when suboptimal.
-
Fairness in Multi-Agent Systems for Software Engineering: An SDLC-Oriented Rapid Review
A rapid review of fairness in LLM-enabled multi-agent systems for the software development lifecycle concludes that the field lacks standardized evaluations, broad coverage, and effective governance, leaving it unprepared for deployable fair systems.