Only about 21% of popular public Jupyter notebooks are truly broken, while most apparent failures stem from missing packages, files, or execution order and are at least partially executable.
To- wards exploring the code reuse from stack overflow during software development,
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SE 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Are the Majority of Public Computational Notebooks Pathologically Non-Executable?
Only about 21% of popular public Jupyter notebooks are truly broken, while most apparent failures stem from missing packages, files, or execution order and are at least partially executable.