A physics-transfer graph network trained on simulated growth of simple elastic shells predicts curvature and short-term shape change on a fetal brain atlas, but validation is limited to a single population-averaged atlas.
Validating the predictions of mathematical models describing tumor growth and treatment response
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Despite advances in methods to interrogate tumor biology, the observational and population-based approach of classical cancer research and clinical oncology does not enable anticipation of tumor outcomes to hasten the discovery of cancer mechanisms and personalize disease management. To address these limitations, individualized cancer forecasts have been shown to predict tumor growth and therapeutic response, inform treatment optimization, and guide experimental efforts. These predictions are obtained via computer simulations of mathematical models that are constrained with data from a patient's cancer and experiments. This book chapter addresses the validation of these mathematical models to forecast tumor growth and treatment response. We start with an overview of mathematical modeling frameworks, model selection techniques, and fundamental metrics. We then describe the usual strategies employed to validate cancer forecasts in preclinical and clinical scenarios. Finally, we discuss existing barriers in validating these predictions along with potential strategies to address them.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
q-bio.NC 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Predicting Brain Morphogenesis via Physics-Transfer Learning
A physics-transfer graph network trained on simulated growth of simple elastic shells predicts curvature and short-term shape change on a fetal brain atlas, but validation is limited to a single population-averaged atlas.