Mamba's per-word timesteps significantly predict human reading times beyond GPT-2 surprisal in a naturalistic dataset.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
fields
cs.CL 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
Noisy memory encoding of determiners explains negative polarity illusions, with new acceptability experiments showing stronger illusions for similar determiner pairs.
citing papers explorer
-
Timesteps of Mamba Align with Human Reading Times
Mamba's per-word timesteps significantly predict human reading times beyond GPT-2 surprisal in a naturalistic dataset.
-
Noisy memory encoding explains negative polarity illusions
Noisy memory encoding of determiners explains negative polarity illusions, with new acceptability experiments showing stronger illusions for similar determiner pairs.