Pith. sign in

A model-independent treatment of cosmic ladder calibration and $\Omega_k$ measurement through low-$z$ observations

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Looking at the well-known Hubble tension as a tension in the calibrators of the cosmic distance ladder, i.e. the absolute magnitude $M$ of standard candles such as supernovae of Type Ia (SNIa) and the standard ruler represented by the comoving sound horizon at the baryon-drag epoch, $r_d$, we propose a model-independent method to measure these distance calibrators independently from the cosmic microwave background and the first rungs of the direct distance ladder. To do so, we leverage state-of-the-art data on cosmic chronometers (CCH), SNIa and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) from various galaxy surveys. Taking advantage of the Gaussian Processes Bayesian technique, we reconstruct $M(z)$, $\Omega_k(z)$ and $r_d(z)$ at $z\lesssim2$ and check that no significant statistical evolution is preferred at 68\% C.L. This allows us to treat them as constants and constrain them assuming the metric description of gravity, the cosmological principle and the validity of CCH as reliable cosmic clocks, and SNIa and BAO as optimal standard candles and standard rulers, respectively, but otherwise in a model-independent way. We obtain: $\Omega_k=-0.07^{+0.12}_{-0.15}$, $M=(-19.314^{+0.086}_{-0.108})$ mag and $r_d=(142.3\pm 5.3)$ Mpc. At present, the uncertainties derived are still too large to arbitrate the tension but this is bound to change in the near future with the advent of upcoming surveys and data.

fields

astro-ph.CO 1

years

2024 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Measuring the expansion history of the Universe with cosmic chronometers astro-ph.CO · 2024-12-02 · unverdicted · none · ref 52 · internal anchor

    A review of the cosmic chronometer method: differential ages of massive passive galaxies yield cosmology-independent H(z) measurements, now at about 5% accuracy at z~0.5 and potentially percent-level H0 with future surveys.