Thrust can be computed in O(N^2) time with a Grover-based quantum algorithm under a sequential data-loading model, and in O(N^2 log N) time classically with sorting, but the quantum advantage is only formal for very restrictive memory models.
Quantum Associative Memory in HEP Track Pattern Recognition
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We have entered the Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Era. A plethora of quantum processor prototypes allow evaluation of potential of the Quantum Computing paradigm in applications to pressing computational problems of the future. Growing data input rates and detector resolution foreseen in High-Energy LHC (2030s) experiments expose the often high time and/or space complexity of classical algorithms. Quantum algorithms can potentially become the lower-complexity alternatives in such cases. In this work we discuss the potential of Quantum Associative Memory (QuAM) in the context of LHC data triggering. We examine the practical limits of storage capacity, as well as store and recall errorless efficiency, from the viewpoints of the state-of-the-art IBM quantum processors and LHC real-time charged track pattern recognition requirements. We present a software prototype implementation of the QuAM protocols and analyze the topological limitations for porting the simplest QuAM instances to the public IBM 5Q and 14Q cloud-based superconducting chips.
fields
hep-ph 1years
2019 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Quantum Algorithms for Jet Clustering
Thrust can be computed in O(N^2) time with a Grover-based quantum algorithm under a sequential data-loading model, and in O(N^2 log N) time classically with sorting, but the quantum advantage is only formal for very restrictive memory models.