A benchmark of supervised, self-supervised, and semi-supervised contrastive learning on CIFAR-10 and EuroSAT shows labeling energy can dominate training energy, with semi-supervised CCSSL providing a favorable accuracy-energy trade-off.
Self-Supervised Learning at the Edge: The Cost of Labeling
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Contrastive learning (CL) has recently emerged as an alternative to traditional supervised machine learning solutions by enabling rich representations from unstructured and unlabeled data. However, CL and, more broadly, self-supervised learning (SSL) methods often demand a large amount of data and computational resources, posing challenges for deployment on resource-constrained edge devices. In this work, we explore the feasibility and efficiency of SSL techniques for edge-based learning, focusing on trade-offs between model performance and energy efficiency. In particular, we analyze how different SSL techniques adapt to limited computational, data, and energy budgets, evaluating their effectiveness in learning robust representations under resource-constrained settings. Moreover, we also consider the energy costs involved in labeling data and assess how semi-supervised learning may assist in reducing the overall energy consumed to train CL models. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate that tailored SSL strategies can achieve competitive performance while reducing resource consumption by up to 4X, underscoring their potential for energy-efficient learning at the edge.
fields
cs.LG 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Self-Supervised Learning at the Edge: The Cost of Labeling
A benchmark of supervised, self-supervised, and semi-supervised contrastive learning on CIFAR-10 and EuroSAT shows labeling energy can dominate training energy, with semi-supervised CCSSL providing a favorable accuracy-energy trade-off.