LLMs can be statistically superior to humans at estimating group-level judgments on subjective tasks because of their low variance and decoupled representation-processing biases.
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
From Fallback to Frontline: When Can LLMs be Superior Annotators of Human Perspectives?
LLMs can be statistically superior to humans at estimating group-level judgments on subjective tasks because of their low variance and decoupled representation-processing biases.