Analyzing intermediate reasoning in LLMs reveals substantially more mental health stigma than MCQ evaluations by using clinical categories to tag and rate problematic statements.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Analyzing LLM Reasoning to Uncover Mental Health Stigma
Analyzing intermediate reasoning in LLMs reveals substantially more mental health stigma than MCQ evaluations by using clinical categories to tag and rate problematic statements.