Pith. sign in

Complexity analysis of normalizing constant estima- tion: from jarzynski equality to annealed importance sampling and beyond.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04575

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it
abstract

Given an unnormalized probability density $\pi\propto\mathrm{e}^{-V}$, estimating its normalizing constant $Z=\int_{\mathbb{R}^d}\mathrm{e}^{-V(x)}\mathrm{d}x$ or free energy $F=-\log Z$ is a crucial problem in Bayesian statistics, statistical mechanics, and machine learning. It is challenging especially in high dimensions or when $\pi$ is multimodal. To mitigate the high variance of conventional importance sampling estimators, annealing-based methods such as Jarzynski equality and annealed importance sampling are commonly adopted, yet their quantitative complexity guarantees remain largely unexplored. We take a first step toward a non-asymptotic analysis of annealed importance sampling. In particular, we derive an oracle complexity of $\widetilde{O}\left(\frac{d\beta^2{\mathcal{A}}^2}{\varepsilon^4}\right)$ for estimating $Z$ within $\varepsilon$ relative error with high probability, where $\beta$ is the smoothness of $V$ and $\mathcal{A}$ denotes the action of a curve of probability measures interpolating $\pi$ and a tractable reference distribution. Our analysis, leveraging Girsanov's theorem and optimal transport, does not explicitly require isoperimetric assumptions on the target distribution. Finally, to tackle the large action of the widely used geometric interpolation, we propose a new algorithm based on reverse diffusion samplers, establish a framework for analyzing its complexity, and empirically demonstrate its efficiency in tackling multimodality.

years

2026 2

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

representative citing papers

The Wasserstein cost of Importance Sampling

math.PR · 2026-05-28 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

The expected p-Wasserstein cost of importance sampling is of order n^{-p/d} with matching constants, and the asymptotically optimal proposal is proportional to g^{d/(p+d)}.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.

  • The Wasserstein cost of Importance Sampling math.PR · 2026-05-28 · unverdicted · none · ref 26 · internal anchor

    The expected p-Wasserstein cost of importance sampling is of order n^{-p/d} with matching constants, and the asymptotically optimal proposal is proportional to g^{d/(p+d)}.

  • Sample-efficient evidence estimation of score based priors for model selection cs.LG · 2026-02-24 · unverdicted · none · ref 6 · internal anchor

    DiME estimates model evidence for diffusion priors by integrating time-marginals from posterior sampling, enabling efficient prior selection and misfit diagnosis in ill-posed inverse problems.