A methodological framework detects subtle group-associated linguistic biases in LLM outputs by generating controlled synthetic minimal pairs, abstracting n-grams, and ranking high-signal fragments with a PMI variant for expert review.
Title resolution pending
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
other 1
citation-polarity summary
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
other 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
Empirical study across 10 tasks showing bias inheritance from LLM-augmented data harms related downstream performance, with three misalignment factors and three mitigation strategies identified.
LLMs generate narratives containing persistent stereotypes, erasure, and one-dimensional portrayals of Global Majority national identities, with minoritized groups overrepresented in subordinated roles by more than fifty times compared to dominant portrayals.
citing papers explorer
-
Contrastive Analysis of Linguistic Representations in Large Language Model Outputs through Structured Synthetic Data Generation and Abstracted N-gram Associations
A methodological framework detects subtle group-associated linguistic biases in LLM outputs by generating controlled synthetic minimal pairs, abstracting n-grams, and ranking high-signal fragments with a PMI variant for expert review.
-
Understanding and Mitigating Bias Inheritance in LLM-based Data Augmentation on Downstream Tasks
Empirical study across 10 tasks showing bias inheritance from LLM-augmented data harms related downstream performance, with three misalignment factors and three mitigation strategies identified.
-
Representational Harms in LLM-Generated Narratives Against Global Majority Nationalities
LLMs generate narratives containing persistent stereotypes, erasure, and one-dimensional portrayals of Global Majority national identities, with minoritized groups overrepresented in subordinated roles by more than fifty times compared to dominant portrayals.