Humans reach 64.8% accuracy detecting synthetic legal evidence images overall but drop to chance levels on top generators, while MLLMs achieve 100% specificity yet only 5.9% detection on the hardest synthetics, with uncorrelated error patterns.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CV 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Can You Trust What You See? Human and AI Detection of Synthetic Legal Evidence
Humans reach 64.8% accuracy detecting synthetic legal evidence images overall but drop to chance levels on top generators, while MLLMs achieve 100% specificity yet only 5.9% detection on the hardest synthetics, with uncorrelated error patterns.