Pith. sign in

PIP-Net: Pedestrian Intention Prediction in the Wild

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Accurate pedestrian intention prediction (PIP) by Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) is one of the current research challenges in this field. In this article, we introduce PIP-Net, a novel framework designed to predict pedestrian crossing intentions by AVs in real-world urban scenarios. We offer two variants of PIP-Net designed for different camera mounts and setups. Leveraging both kinematic data and spatial features from the driving scene, the proposed model employs a recurrent and temporal attention-based solution, outperforming state-of-the-art performance. To enhance the visual representation of road users and their proximity to the ego vehicle, we introduce a categorical depth feature map, combined with a local motion flow feature, providing rich insights into the scene dynamics. Additionally, we explore the impact of expanding the camera's field of view, from one to three cameras surrounding the ego vehicle, leading to an enhancement in the model's contextual perception. Depending on the traffic scenario and road environment, the model excels in predicting pedestrian crossing intentions up to 4 seconds in advance, which is a breakthrough in current research studies in pedestrian intention prediction. Finally, for the first time, we present the Urban-PIP dataset, a customised pedestrian intention prediction dataset, with multi-camera annotations in real-world automated driving scenarios.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CV 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

support 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Pedestrian Intention Prediction via Vision-Language Foundation Models cs.CV · 2025-07-05 · conditional · none · ref 4 · internal anchor

    Time-aware vehicle-speed prompts improve vision-language model accuracy for pedestrian crossing intent, but the claimed edge over specialized vision models is not consistent across the paper's own benchmarks.