Public technical AI governance almost never evaluates real foreign-policy AI workflows; the paper maps that gap and proposes task-scoped, human-recombined evaluation instead of model leaderboards.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 10 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
10
external citations · external index
fields
cs.CY 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Foreign Policy AI Evaluation Gap
Public technical AI governance almost never evaluates real foreign-policy AI workflows; the paper maps that gap and proposes task-scoped, human-recombined evaluation instead of model leaderboards.