self-evident

to a leading HCI journal which was rejected on the basis that the validity of its “self-evident” findings was “compromised” by a small set of interviews from a small sample, the trigger, as reported, for H is for Human · 2026

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it

browse 1 citing papers

representative citing papers

Author response to commentaries on H is for Human and How (Not) to Evaluate Qualitative Research in HCI

cs.HC · 2026-04-28 · unverdicted · novelty 1.0

The author responds to commentaries on the paper 'H is for Human and How (Not) to Evaluate Qualitative Research in HCI'.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

Author response to commentaries on H is for Human and How (Not) to Evaluate Qualitative Research in HCI cs.HC · 2026-04-28 · unverdicted · none · ref 2
The author responds to commentaries on the paper 'H is for Human and How (Not) to Evaluate Qualitative Research in HCI'.

self-evident

fields

years

verdicts

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer