Logical soundness is not a reliable criterion for neurosymbolic fact-checking with LLMs because it systematically diverges from human pragmatic inferences.
Title resolution pending
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CL 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Position: Logical Soundness is not a Reliable Criterion for Neurosymbolic Fact-Checking with LLMs
Logical soundness is not a reliable criterion for neurosymbolic fact-checking with LLMs because it systematically diverges from human pragmatic inferences.