For ~20 000 particles in 3D, D&R is ~1800× faster than dp3D with a 9% relative-density shortfall, while DEM reaches denser packings at much higher cost.
Prac- tical Applications of Hotisostatic Pressing Dia- grams: Four Case Studies
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 399 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
399
external citations · OpenAlex
fields
cond-mat.mtrl-sci 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Generation of representative powder particle packing in 2D/3D: which tool for which application?
For ~20 000 particles in 3D, D&R is ~1800× faster than dp3D with a 9% relative-density shortfall, while DEM reaches denser packings at much higher cost.